The Government's industrial relations policyregarded the awards and orders of t… --> Train drivers were warned beforehand, so there were zero injuries or casualties. The dispute meant goods weren't being unloaded from the ports as quickly and that led to shortages for both shops and households. The 1951 waterfront dispute is one of the most widely written about industrial struggles in New Zealand history. In 1951, during the New Zealand waterfront dispute and strike, an explosion destroyed the Huntly rail bridge.The bridge linked four open-cast mines and several pits in the Waikato coalfields with the Huntly township and the railway line, so its demolition was intended to disrupt coal supplies.. Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. Article contents. workers’ decisions in the last month of the dispute, however, demonstrates that the dispute was not a game that anyone controlled, and the actions of pawns were as important as the actions of any other piece. Tommy Wells addressing waterside workers, 1951. The first of six parts of this full length documentary. NZ History section on the 1951 waterfront dispute, Te Ara section on strikes and labour disputes in New Zealand, Te Ara section on ports and harbours in New Zealand. Jock Barnes, strike leader: The ship owners' representatives did meet us. The fourth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. They had their own tribunal, which they had insisted upon, to go to and ask for the increase if they wanted it. Keith Belford, employer: The employers considered that the watersiders had no legal entitlement to the 15% given by the Court of Arbitration. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 4) Size: The sixth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Waterfront Dispute was the general dissatisfaction of Labour Government during and after the Second World War. Jock was 84 years old, and still “going strong”. Importance of the waterfront. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/469bdc0733c98271" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > (1) Legislation becameeffective in early 1997. The 1951 waterfront lockout began, in February 1951, as a dispute between ship-owners and watersiders over wages. The government was already in a strong position. Don't Scab! src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/b9f9d090eabb7d5c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > --> 410 The 1951 waterfront dispute was the biggest industrial confrontation in New Zealand’s history. 585 --> style="width: 585px" The 1951 waterfront lockout is probably the most famous industrial dispute in New Zealand history, although it wasn’t the largest-scale such dispute. In 1951, New Zealand temporarily became a police state. It lasted 151 days, from February to July 1951. See 50th anniversary documentary for more info. (5 min 7 sec) 410 height="410" The second of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Thousands more refused to handle " scab " goods. Size: Dougal Stevenson, documentary narrator: By the end of 1950, then, the signs were there. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Issued by industry unions during the 1951 Waterfront Strike, this poster intended to discourage unionists from betraying the industry actions. Sensing the swing of sympathy from the strikers to the government, the Federation of Labour took the opportunity to censure its militant offshoot, the Trades Union Congress, and threw its support behind the government. Union members who were involved in the 1951 Waterfront Dispute were prosecuted and were discriminate against by the society, and especially at the workplaces. -->, , We'll send you a weekly email with our picks of new and featured content, – Ex NZ Waterside Workers' Union leader Jock Barnes on events before the dispute began, , Although it was not as violent as the Great Strike of 1913, it lasted longer – 151 days, from February to July – and involved more workers. In the struggle to come, the Federation of Labour would actively support the government and reinforce the attitudes of the press and the general public. Any re-use of this audio is a breach of copyright. Without this backing of public opinion, without the press, the employers would never have been able to contemplate the action they ultimately took. The regulations applied to children too. 1951 Waterfront Dispute One of the biggest industrial confrontations in New Zealand history (known as the 1951 Waterfront Strike or Lockout, depending on your perspective) began on 13 February 1951. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Reference no: T819, Image: Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 1) Women had been hit the worst during the 1951 waterfront dispute. The origins of the 1951 waterfront lockout have been covered elsewhere, and … 1951- Clip: 1951 (credits) This was the essential spark. Revolution - 2, The Grand Illusion. Documentary on the 1951 waterfront workers’ dispute. So I invited him to come in too. This collection pays homage to the Kiwi fighting spirit, and willingness to stand up for a cause. The cost of living had increased rapidly and the government asked the Arbitration Court to make an interim general wage order. It is a view supported by this Gordon Minhinnick cartoon, which shows the wharfies as a puppet operated by a puppeteer from the World Federation of Trade Unions, who also sports a Soviet hammer-and-sickle badge. One illustration of the implications ofthe new legislation is the waterfront dispute which began to unfoldin January 1998. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/a7f1e315432f5f9f" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > The men were fathers, husbands, brothers and sons, and their lack of wages affected the family that they lived with and their wider kin networks. It consists of a selection of different source material, much of which would have been printed on 'underground' printing presses and would have been illegal under emergency regulations … Waterfront reform has been on the national political agenda since the mid-1980s. It was only by the open assistance of the Federation of Labour that it was possible for them to win. height="410" All non-text content is subject to specific conditions. The Coalition was elected to government in March1996 having made commitments to the electorate to improveefficiency and the labour market by substantially restructuringindustrial relations, particularly by offering greater choice inmany aspects of industrial relations. 410 Their employers locked them out of the workplace, and the government banned union meetings and publications. , , , , , At times private homes like Mrs Mitchell's in Auckland were raided. 3:56 PREVIEW Idle Ships. The Government's industrial relations policyregarded the awards and orders of t… --> Train drivers were warned beforehand, so there were zero injuries or casualties. The dispute meant goods weren't being unloaded from the ports as quickly and that led to shortages for both shops and households. The 1951 waterfront dispute is one of the most widely written about industrial struggles in New Zealand history. In 1951, during the New Zealand waterfront dispute and strike, an explosion destroyed the Huntly rail bridge.The bridge linked four open-cast mines and several pits in the Waikato coalfields with the Huntly township and the railway line, so its demolition was intended to disrupt coal supplies.. Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. Article contents. workers’ decisions in the last month of the dispute, however, demonstrates that the dispute was not a game that anyone controlled, and the actions of pawns were as important as the actions of any other piece. Tommy Wells addressing waterside workers, 1951. The first of six parts of this full length documentary. NZ History section on the 1951 waterfront dispute, Te Ara section on strikes and labour disputes in New Zealand, Te Ara section on ports and harbours in New Zealand. Jock Barnes, strike leader: The ship owners' representatives did meet us. The fourth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. They had their own tribunal, which they had insisted upon, to go to and ask for the increase if they wanted it. Keith Belford, employer: The employers considered that the watersiders had no legal entitlement to the 15% given by the Court of Arbitration. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 4) Size: The sixth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Waterfront Dispute was the general dissatisfaction of Labour Government during and after the Second World War. Jock was 84 years old, and still “going strong”. Importance of the waterfront. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/469bdc0733c98271" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > (1) Legislation becameeffective in early 1997. The 1951 waterfront lockout began, in February 1951, as a dispute between ship-owners and watersiders over wages. The government was already in a strong position. Don't Scab! src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/b9f9d090eabb7d5c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > --> 410 The 1951 waterfront dispute was the biggest industrial confrontation in New Zealand’s history. 585 --> style="width: 585px" The 1951 waterfront lockout is probably the most famous industrial dispute in New Zealand history, although it wasn’t the largest-scale such dispute. In 1951, New Zealand temporarily became a police state. It lasted 151 days, from February to July 1951. See 50th anniversary documentary for more info. (5 min 7 sec) 410 height="410" The second of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Thousands more refused to handle " scab " goods. Size: Dougal Stevenson, documentary narrator: By the end of 1950, then, the signs were there. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Issued by industry unions during the 1951 Waterfront Strike, this poster intended to discourage unionists from betraying the industry actions. Sensing the swing of sympathy from the strikers to the government, the Federation of Labour took the opportunity to censure its militant offshoot, the Trades Union Congress, and threw its support behind the government. Union members who were involved in the 1951 Waterfront Dispute were prosecuted and were discriminate against by the society, and especially at the workplaces. -->, , We'll send you a weekly email with our picks of new and featured content, – Ex NZ Waterside Workers' Union leader Jock Barnes on events before the dispute began, , Although it was not as violent as the Great Strike of 1913, it lasted longer – 151 days, from February to July – and involved more workers. In the struggle to come, the Federation of Labour would actively support the government and reinforce the attitudes of the press and the general public. Any re-use of this audio is a breach of copyright. Without this backing of public opinion, without the press, the employers would never have been able to contemplate the action they ultimately took. The regulations applied to children too. 1951 Waterfront Dispute One of the biggest industrial confrontations in New Zealand history (known as the 1951 Waterfront Strike or Lockout, depending on your perspective) began on 13 February 1951. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Reference no: T819, Image: Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 1) Women had been hit the worst during the 1951 waterfront dispute. The origins of the 1951 waterfront lockout have been covered elsewhere, and … 1951- Clip: 1951 (credits) This was the essential spark. Revolution - 2, The Grand Illusion. Documentary on the 1951 waterfront workers’ dispute. So I invited him to come in too. This collection pays homage to the Kiwi fighting spirit, and willingness to stand up for a cause. The cost of living had increased rapidly and the government asked the Arbitration Court to make an interim general wage order. It is a view supported by this Gordon Minhinnick cartoon, which shows the wharfies as a puppet operated by a puppeteer from the World Federation of Trade Unions, who also sports a Soviet hammer-and-sickle badge. One illustration of the implications ofthe new legislation is the waterfront dispute which began to unfoldin January 1998. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/a7f1e315432f5f9f" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > The men were fathers, husbands, brothers and sons, and their lack of wages affected the family that they lived with and their wider kin networks. It consists of a selection of different source material, much of which would have been printed on 'underground' printing presses and would have been illegal under emergency regulations … Waterfront reform has been on the national political agenda since the mid-1980s. It was only by the open assistance of the Federation of Labour that it was possible for them to win. height="410" All non-text content is subject to specific conditions. The Coalition was elected to government in March1996 having made commitments to the electorate to improveefficiency and the labour market by substantially restructuringindustrial relations, particularly by offering greater choice inmany aspects of industrial relations. 410 Their employers locked them out of the workplace, and the government banned union meetings and publications. , , , , , At times private homes like Mrs Mitchell's in Auckland were raided. 3:56 PREVIEW Idle Ships. The Government's industrial relations policyregarded the awards and orders of t… --> Train drivers were warned beforehand, so there were zero injuries or casualties. The dispute meant goods weren't being unloaded from the ports as quickly and that led to shortages for both shops and households. The 1951 waterfront dispute is one of the most widely written about industrial struggles in New Zealand history. In 1951, during the New Zealand waterfront dispute and strike, an explosion destroyed the Huntly rail bridge.The bridge linked four open-cast mines and several pits in the Waikato coalfields with the Huntly township and the railway line, so its demolition was intended to disrupt coal supplies.. Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. Article contents. workers’ decisions in the last month of the dispute, however, demonstrates that the dispute was not a game that anyone controlled, and the actions of pawns were as important as the actions of any other piece. Tommy Wells addressing waterside workers, 1951. The first of six parts of this full length documentary. NZ History section on the 1951 waterfront dispute, Te Ara section on strikes and labour disputes in New Zealand, Te Ara section on ports and harbours in New Zealand. Jock Barnes, strike leader: The ship owners' representatives did meet us. The fourth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. They had their own tribunal, which they had insisted upon, to go to and ask for the increase if they wanted it. Keith Belford, employer: The employers considered that the watersiders had no legal entitlement to the 15% given by the Court of Arbitration. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 4) Size: The sixth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Waterfront Dispute was the general dissatisfaction of Labour Government during and after the Second World War. Jock was 84 years old, and still “going strong”. Importance of the waterfront. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/469bdc0733c98271" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > (1) Legislation becameeffective in early 1997. The 1951 waterfront lockout began, in February 1951, as a dispute between ship-owners and watersiders over wages. The government was already in a strong position. Don't Scab! src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/b9f9d090eabb7d5c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > --> 410 The 1951 waterfront dispute was the biggest industrial confrontation in New Zealand’s history. 585 --> style="width: 585px" The 1951 waterfront lockout is probably the most famous industrial dispute in New Zealand history, although it wasn’t the largest-scale such dispute. In 1951, New Zealand temporarily became a police state. It lasted 151 days, from February to July 1951. See 50th anniversary documentary for more info. (5 min 7 sec) 410 height="410" The second of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Thousands more refused to handle " scab " goods. Size: Dougal Stevenson, documentary narrator: By the end of 1950, then, the signs were there. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Issued by industry unions during the 1951 Waterfront Strike, this poster intended to discourage unionists from betraying the industry actions. Sensing the swing of sympathy from the strikers to the government, the Federation of Labour took the opportunity to censure its militant offshoot, the Trades Union Congress, and threw its support behind the government. Union members who were involved in the 1951 Waterfront Dispute were prosecuted and were discriminate against by the society, and especially at the workplaces. -->, , We'll send you a weekly email with our picks of new and featured content, – Ex NZ Waterside Workers' Union leader Jock Barnes on events before the dispute began, , Although it was not as violent as the Great Strike of 1913, it lasted longer – 151 days, from February to July – and involved more workers. In the struggle to come, the Federation of Labour would actively support the government and reinforce the attitudes of the press and the general public. Any re-use of this audio is a breach of copyright. Without this backing of public opinion, without the press, the employers would never have been able to contemplate the action they ultimately took. The regulations applied to children too. 1951 Waterfront Dispute One of the biggest industrial confrontations in New Zealand history (known as the 1951 Waterfront Strike or Lockout, depending on your perspective) began on 13 February 1951. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Reference no: T819, Image: Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 1) Women had been hit the worst during the 1951 waterfront dispute. The origins of the 1951 waterfront lockout have been covered elsewhere, and … 1951- Clip: 1951 (credits) This was the essential spark. Revolution - 2, The Grand Illusion. Documentary on the 1951 waterfront workers’ dispute. So I invited him to come in too. This collection pays homage to the Kiwi fighting spirit, and willingness to stand up for a cause. The cost of living had increased rapidly and the government asked the Arbitration Court to make an interim general wage order. It is a view supported by this Gordon Minhinnick cartoon, which shows the wharfies as a puppet operated by a puppeteer from the World Federation of Trade Unions, who also sports a Soviet hammer-and-sickle badge. One illustration of the implications ofthe new legislation is the waterfront dispute which began to unfoldin January 1998. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/a7f1e315432f5f9f" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > The men were fathers, husbands, brothers and sons, and their lack of wages affected the family that they lived with and their wider kin networks. It consists of a selection of different source material, much of which would have been printed on 'underground' printing presses and would have been illegal under emergency regulations … Waterfront reform has been on the national political agenda since the mid-1980s. It was only by the open assistance of the Federation of Labour that it was possible for them to win. height="410" All non-text content is subject to specific conditions. The Coalition was elected to government in March1996 having made commitments to the electorate to improveefficiency and the labour market by substantially restructuringindustrial relations, particularly by offering greater choice inmany aspects of industrial relations. 410 Their employers locked them out of the workplace, and the government banned union meetings and publications. , , , ,
EST. 2002

1951 waterfront dispute documentary

-->, At times private homes like Mrs Mitchell's in Auckland were raided. 3:56 PREVIEW Idle Ships. The Government's industrial relations policyregarded the awards and orders of t… --> Train drivers were warned beforehand, so there were zero injuries or casualties. The dispute meant goods weren't being unloaded from the ports as quickly and that led to shortages for both shops and households. The 1951 waterfront dispute is one of the most widely written about industrial struggles in New Zealand history. In 1951, during the New Zealand waterfront dispute and strike, an explosion destroyed the Huntly rail bridge.The bridge linked four open-cast mines and several pits in the Waikato coalfields with the Huntly township and the railway line, so its demolition was intended to disrupt coal supplies.. Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. Article contents. workers’ decisions in the last month of the dispute, however, demonstrates that the dispute was not a game that anyone controlled, and the actions of pawns were as important as the actions of any other piece. Tommy Wells addressing waterside workers, 1951. The first of six parts of this full length documentary. NZ History section on the 1951 waterfront dispute, Te Ara section on strikes and labour disputes in New Zealand, Te Ara section on ports and harbours in New Zealand. Jock Barnes, strike leader: The ship owners' representatives did meet us. The fourth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. They had their own tribunal, which they had insisted upon, to go to and ask for the increase if they wanted it. Keith Belford, employer: The employers considered that the watersiders had no legal entitlement to the 15% given by the Court of Arbitration. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 4) Size: The sixth of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Waterfront Dispute was the general dissatisfaction of Labour Government during and after the Second World War. Jock was 84 years old, and still “going strong”. Importance of the waterfront. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/469bdc0733c98271" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > (1) Legislation becameeffective in early 1997. The 1951 waterfront lockout began, in February 1951, as a dispute between ship-owners and watersiders over wages. The government was already in a strong position. Don't Scab! src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/b9f9d090eabb7d5c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > --> 410 The 1951 waterfront dispute was the biggest industrial confrontation in New Zealand’s history. 585 --> style="width: 585px" The 1951 waterfront lockout is probably the most famous industrial dispute in New Zealand history, although it wasn’t the largest-scale such dispute. In 1951, New Zealand temporarily became a police state. It lasted 151 days, from February to July 1951. See 50th anniversary documentary for more info. (5 min 7 sec) 410 height="410" The second of 6 parts of this full length documentary. Thousands more refused to handle " scab " goods. Size: Dougal Stevenson, documentary narrator: By the end of 1950, then, the signs were there. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Issued by industry unions during the 1951 Waterfront Strike, this poster intended to discourage unionists from betraying the industry actions. Sensing the swing of sympathy from the strikers to the government, the Federation of Labour took the opportunity to censure its militant offshoot, the Trades Union Congress, and threw its support behind the government. Union members who were involved in the 1951 Waterfront Dispute were prosecuted and were discriminate against by the society, and especially at the workplaces. -->, , We'll send you a weekly email with our picks of new and featured content, – Ex NZ Waterside Workers' Union leader Jock Barnes on events before the dispute began, , Although it was not as violent as the Great Strike of 1913, it lasted longer – 151 days, from February to July – and involved more workers. In the struggle to come, the Federation of Labour would actively support the government and reinforce the attitudes of the press and the general public. Any re-use of this audio is a breach of copyright. Without this backing of public opinion, without the press, the employers would never have been able to contemplate the action they ultimately took. The regulations applied to children too. 1951 Waterfront Dispute One of the biggest industrial confrontations in New Zealand history (known as the 1951 Waterfront Strike or Lockout, depending on your perspective) began on 13 February 1951. Quote: Twenty years ago I interviewed the leading figure of the 1951 waterfront dispute. Reference no: T819, Image: Union march during 1951 waterfront dispute. 1951- Clip: 1951 (clip 1) Women had been hit the worst during the 1951 waterfront dispute. The origins of the 1951 waterfront lockout have been covered elsewhere, and … 1951- Clip: 1951 (credits) This was the essential spark. Revolution - 2, The Grand Illusion. Documentary on the 1951 waterfront workers’ dispute. So I invited him to come in too. This collection pays homage to the Kiwi fighting spirit, and willingness to stand up for a cause. The cost of living had increased rapidly and the government asked the Arbitration Court to make an interim general wage order. It is a view supported by this Gordon Minhinnick cartoon, which shows the wharfies as a puppet operated by a puppeteer from the World Federation of Trade Unions, who also sports a Soviet hammer-and-sickle badge. One illustration of the implications ofthe new legislation is the waterfront dispute which began to unfoldin January 1998. src="https://www.nzonscreen.com/embed/a7f1e315432f5f9f" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen > The men were fathers, husbands, brothers and sons, and their lack of wages affected the family that they lived with and their wider kin networks. It consists of a selection of different source material, much of which would have been printed on 'underground' printing presses and would have been illegal under emergency regulations … Waterfront reform has been on the national political agenda since the mid-1980s. It was only by the open assistance of the Federation of Labour that it was possible for them to win. height="410" All non-text content is subject to specific conditions. The Coalition was elected to government in March1996 having made commitments to the electorate to improveefficiency and the labour market by substantially restructuringindustrial relations, particularly by offering greater choice inmany aspects of industrial relations. 410 Their employers locked them out of the workplace, and the government banned union meetings and publications. , , , ,

Ajánló

ugrás fel